Empathy in Phenomenological Psychology and Psychotherapy
https://doi.org/10.25205/2658-4506-2022-15-2-5-16
Abstract
This study aims to focuses on the problem of access to other minds within phenomenological psychotherapy. The problem is that the Other is at the same time a phenomenon that is constituted by my consciousness and a transcendental subject located in objective reality. The author begins with the materials of the 1925 summer course of lectures given by Husserl in Freiburg, which set out the essence of the “new psychology” project. The new psychology should become an alternative to the natural-scientific approach, and should refer to direct individual experience. Therefore, it has intentional life as an object, refusing excessive theorizing about the psychological phenomena. The psychologist reveals the universal pre-experimental structures of consciousness through intuition, working with a priori forms. Empathy (German: Einfüllung) plays an important role in the work of a psychologist and psychotherapist. Husserl developed his concept of empathy through a rethinking of the theory of empathy by T. Lipps and understood it not as a mirror process, but as a projecting assimilation. Functional commonality allows you to create a bridge between the perceiving subject and the one who is perceived. Husserl’s concept of empathy became the basis for developing a number of productive therapeutic approaches. At the end of the article, two examples of such approaches are given: the phenomenological psychiatry of K. Jaspers and the method of subverbal communication of E. Gendelin.
About the Author
A. A. SanzhenakovRussian Federation
Alexander A. Sanzhenakov, PhD, senior researcher
Scopus Author ID 56786323200
AuthorID RSCI 625579
Novosibirsk
References
1. Avramides A. Other Minds // The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy / Ed. by E.N. Zalta. 2020. URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2020/entries/other-minds/ (Accessed: 13.13.2022).
2. Binswanger L. Phenomenology and psychopathology // Logos. 1992. No. 3. P. 125–136. (in Russ.)
3. Borisov E.V. The problem of intersubjectivity in the phenomenology of E. Husserl // Logos. 1999. No. 11. P. 65–83. (in Russ.)
4. Gendelin E. Subverbal communication and expressiveness of the therapist: trends in the development of client-centered psychotherapy // Moscow psychotherapeutic journal. 1993. No. 3. (in Russ.)
5. Husserl E. Cartesian Meditations. Moscow, Akademicheskii Proekt Publ., 2010. 229 p. (in Russ.)
6. Husserl E. Phenomenological Psychology. Lectures, Summer Semester, 1925. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1977. 186 p.
7. Jaspers K. Phenomenological direction of research in psychopathology // Logos. 1994. No. 5. P. 25–41. (in Russ.)
8. Krutous V. P. Analysis of the concept of “feeling” in the phenomenological psychology of E. Husserl // Bulletin of the Moscow State Linguistic University. 2016. No. 2(765). P. 173–191. (in Russ.)
9. Kuchinskii G. M. Phenomenological psychology of E. Husserl // Psychological journal. 2010. No. 1. P. 14–25. (in Russ.)
10. Langdridge D. Phenomenological Psychology. Theory, Research and Method. Harlow: Pearson Education, 2007. 181 p.
11. Lipps T. Das Wissen von Fremden Ichen // Psychologische Untersuchungen. Bd. 1. 1907. S. 694–722.
12. Mill J. S. An Examination of Sir William Hamilton’s Philosophy. London: Longman, Green, Reader and Dyer, 1872. 650 p.
13. Russell B. Analogy // Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1923. P. 501–505.
14. Ulanovskii A. M. Phenomenology in psychology and psychotherapy: clarification of indistinct experiences // Moscow psychotherapeutic journal. 2009. No. 2. P. 27–51. (in Russ.)
15. Walsh P. J. Husserl on Other Minds // The Husserlian Mind / Ed. by H. Jacobs. New York: Routledge, 2021. P. 257–268.
16. Zahavi D. Self and Other: Exploring Subjectivity, Empathy, and Shame. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. 280 p.
Review
For citations:
Sanzhenakov A.A. Empathy in Phenomenological Psychology and Psychotherapy. Reflexio. 2022;15(2):5-16. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25205/2658-4506-2022-15-2-5-16