reflexioReflexioReflexio2658-45062658-6894НГУ10.25205/2658-4506-2023-16-2-43-58reflexio-115Research ArticleПСИХОЛОГИЧЕСКИЙ ИНСТРУМЕНТАРИЙPSYCHOLOGICAL INSTRUMENTSРазработка и апробация опросника мыслительного потокаDevelopment and Adaptation of Thought Stream Questionnairehttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9593-4345ДорошеваЕ. А.DoroshevaE. A.

Дорошева Елена Алексеевна, кандидат биологических наук, доцент

Новосибирск

Scopus Author ID 6504158742

Author ID RSCI 95192

Elena A. Dorosheva, Candidate of Biological Science, Associate Professor, Senior Researcher

Novosibirsk

Scopus Author ID 6504158742

Author ID RSCI 95192

elena.dorosheva@mail.ruНовосибирский государственный университет; Научно-исследовательский институт медицины и нейронаукРоссияNovosibirsk State University; Scientific Research Institute of Neurosciences and MedicineRussian Federation2023050320251624358Copyright © Дорошева Е.А., 20252025Дорошева Е.А.Dorosheva E.A.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://reflexio.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/115

Статья посвящена проблематике изучения компонентов внутренней речи и их популяционного разнообразия. Также рассматривается представленность визуальных образов в контексте мыслительной активности человека. На выборке, включившей 694 респондента, показан удовлетворительный уровень психометрических характеристик разработанного нами опросника мыслительного потока. Результаты исследования указывают на широкую индивидуальную вариативность изученных компонентов внутренней речи (повествования и споры, обращения к себе, к вымышленному собеседнику или к репрезентации знакомого человека, наличие ответов от воображаемого собеседника, усиление разных компонентов внутренних диалогов и монологов в стрессе) и частоты и яркости внутренних визуальных образов.

The article is devoted to problems of studying the components of inner speech and their population diversity. Representation of visual images in the context of human thought activity is also considered. The sample, which included 694 respondents, shows a satisfactory level of psychometric characteristics of the Thought Stream Questionnaire developed by us. The results of the study indicate a wide individual variability of the studied components of inner speech (narratives and disputes, addressing to oneself, to an imagined interlocutor or to a representation of a familiar person, presence of answers from an inner interlocutor, intensification of different components of internal dialogues and monologues in stress) and frequency and brightness of internal visual images.

внутренняя речьвнутренние визуальные образыопросник мыслительного потокавнутренний монологвнутренний диалогThought streaminner speechinner visual imagesThought Stream Questionnaireinternal monologueinternal dialogueИсследование выполнено в ходе госзадания НИИНМ, регистрационный номер ЦИТиС: 122042700001-9.The work was performed in accordance with the state research contract by Scientific Research Institute of Neurosciences and Medicine, CITiS registration number: 122042700001-9.ReferencesАстрецов Д. А., Леонтьев Д. А. Психодиагностические возможности «Шкалы внутренней диалоговой активности» П. Олеся // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 14: Психология, 2015. № 4. C. 66–82.Astretsov, D. A., & Leontiev, D. A. (2015). Psychodiagnostic capabilities of the “Scale of internal dialogue activity” P. Oles. Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 14. Psychology. 4, 66–82. (in Russ)Выготский Л. С. Лекции по психологии. Мышление и речь. М.: Юрайт, 2019. 432 с.Vygotsky, L. S. (2019). Lectures in psychology. Thinking and speaking. M.: Yuright Publishing House. (in Russ)Давтян Е. Н., Ильичев А. Б., Давтян С. Э. Симптом диалогического расщепления «я» как начальный этап нарушения внутренней речи при шизофрении // Психиатрия и психофармакотерапия, 2017. Т. 19, № 6. С. 62–70.Davtyan, E. N., Ilyichev, A. B., & Davtyan, S. E. (2017). The symptom of dialogic splitting of the self as the initial stage of internal speech impairment in schizophrenia. Psychiatry and psychopharmacotherapy, 19(6), 62–70. (in Russ)Дорошева Е. А. Адаптация русскоязычной версии опросника подавления нежелательных мыслей (White Bear Suppression Inventory) // Сибирский психологический журнал. 2024. № 91. С. 22–38. DOI: 10.17223/17267080/91/2Dorosheva, E. A. (2024). Adaptation of the Russian-language version of the White Bear Suppression Inventory. Siberian Psychological Journal. 91, 22–38. DOI: 10.17223/17267080/91/2 (in Russ)Дорошева Е. А., Князев Г. Г. Психометрические свойства трех опросников регуляции эмоций // Материалы научной конференции «Современные проблемы клинической психологии и психологии личности», 2017. С. 193–198.Dorosheva, E. A., & Knyazev, G. G. (2017). Psychometric properties of three questionnaires of emotion regulation. Materials of the scientific conference “Modern problems of clinical psychology and personality psychology.” 193–198. (in Russ)Костина И. Б. Внутренняя речь как форма перехода непроизвольного понимания в свободное владение языком // Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 2012. № 3. С. 130–143.Kostina, I. B. (2012). Internal speech as a form of transition of involuntary understanding into fluency in language. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 3, 130–143. (in Russ)Синельникова Л. Н. Жизнь текста, или Текст жизни. Луганск: Знание, 2005. 455 с.Sinelnikova, L .N. (2005). The life of the text, or the text of life. Lugansk: Knowledge. 455 p. (in Russ)Alderson-Day B., Fernyhough C. Inner speech: development, cognitive functions, phenomenology, and neurobiology // Psychological bulletin. 2015. Т. 141. №. 5. С. 931–965. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000021Alderson-Day, B., & Fernyhough, C. (2015). Inner speech: development, cognitive functions, phenomenology, and neurobiology. Psychological bulletin, 141(5), 931–965. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000021Alderson-Day B., Mitrenga K., Wilkinson S., McCarthy-Jones S., Fernyhough C. The varieties of inner speech questionnaire – Revised (VISQ-R): Replicating and refining links between inner speech and psychopathology // Consciousness and Cognition, 2018. № 65. P. 48–58. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2018.07.001.Alderson-Day, B., Mitrenga, K., Wilkinson, S., McCarthy-Jones, S., & Fernyhough, C. (2018). The varieties of inner speech questionnaire – Revised (VISQ-R): Replicating and refining links between inner speech and psychopathology. Consciousness and Cognition, 65, 48–58. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2018.07.001.Bastian M., Lerique S., Adam V., Franklin M. S., Schooler J. W., Sackur J. Language facilitates introspection: Verbal mind-wandering has privileged access to consciousness // Consciousness and Cognition, 2017. V. 49. P. 86–97. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.01.002Bastian, M., Lerique, S., Adam, V., Franklin, M. S., Schooler, J. W., & Sackur, J. (2017). Language facilitates introspection: Verbal mind-wandering has privileged access to consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition, 49, 86–97. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.01.002Csikszentmihalyi M., Larson R. Validity and reliability of the experiencesampling method //Flow and the foundations of positive psychology. Springer, Dordrecht, 2014. P. 35–54. DOI: 10.1097/00005053-198709000-00004.Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. (2014) Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. Flow and the foundations of positive psychology. Springer, Dordrecht, 2014. P. 35–54. DOI: 10.1097/00005053-198709000-00004.Johnson D. P., Whisman M. A. Gender differences in rumination: A metaanalysis // Personality and Individual Differences, 2013. V. 55. I. 4. P. 367–374. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2013.03.019Johnson, D. P., & Whisman, M. A. (2013). Gender differences in rumination: A meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(4), 367–374. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2013.03.019Heavey C. L., Hurlburt R. T. The phenomena of inner experience // Consciousness and cognition, 2008. V. 17, №. 3. P. 798–810. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2007.12.006Heavey, C. L., & Hurlburt, R. T. (2008). The phenomena of inner experience. Consciousness and cognition, 17(3), 798–810. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2007.12.006Hurlburt R. T., Heavey C. L., Kelsey J. M. Toward a phenomenology of inner speaking // Consciousness and Cognition, 2013. V. 22, №. 4. P. 1477–1494. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.10.003Hurlburt, R. T., Heavey, C. L., & Kelsey, J. M. (2013). Toward a phenomenology of inner speaking. Consciousness and Cognition, 22(4), 1477–1494. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.10.003Oleś P., Puchalska‐Wasyl M. Dialogicality and personality traits / In H. J. M. Hermans & T. Gieser (Eds.), Handbook of dialogical self theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. P. 241–252. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139030434.017Oleś, P., & Puchalska‐Wasyl, M. (2012). Dialogicality and personality traits / In H. J. M. Hermans & T. Gieser (Eds.), Handbook of dialogical self theory (pp. 241–252). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139030434.017Singer J. I., Antrobus J. S. Imaginal Process Inventory. New York: City University of New York, 1970. 30 p.Singer, J. I., & Antrobus, J. S. (1970). Imaginal Process Inventory. New York: City University of New York.Smallwood J., Schooler J. W. (2015).The science of mind wandering: empirically navigating the stream of consciousness // Annual Review of Psychology, 2015. № 66. P. 487–518. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015331Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2015). The science of mind wandering: empirically navigating the stream of consciousness. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 487–518. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015331Treynor W., Gonzalez R., Nolen-Hoeksema S. Rumination Reconsidered: A Psychometric Analysis // Cognitive Therapy and Research, 2003. V. 27. № 3. P. 247–259. DOI: 1.1023/a:1023910315561Treynor, W., Gonzalez, R., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2003). Rumination Reconsidered: A Psychometric Analysis. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 27(3), 247–259. DOI: 1.1023/a:1023910315561Watkins E. R. Constructive and Unconstructive Repetitive Thought // Psychological Bulletin, 2008. V. 134. №. 2. P. 163–206. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.163Watkins, E. R. (2008). Constructive and Unconstructive Repetitive Thought. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 163–206. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.163Winsler A. E., Fernyhough C. E., Montero I. E. Private speech, executive functioning, and the development of verbal self-regulation. Cambridge University Press, 2009. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511581533Winsler, A. E., Fernyhough, C. E., & Montero, I. E. (2009). Private speech, executive functioning, and the development of verbal self-regulation. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511581533Watkins M. Invisible guest: The development of imaginal dialogues. Woodstock, CT: Spring Publications, 2000. 207 p.Watkins, M. (2000). Invisible guest: The development of imaginal dialogues. Woodstock, CT: Spring Publications.Wegner D. M., Schneider D. J., Carter S. R., White T. L. Paradoxical effects of thought suppression // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1987. № 53. P. 5–13. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.5.Wegner D. M., Schneider D. J., Carter S. R., White T. L. (1987). Paradoxical effects of thought suppression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 5–13. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.5.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.